CaliforniaSchoolsLivingston High

Livingston High

PublicRegular
Livingston, California · Merced Union High
Teachers58.0FTE
Ratio19.7:1students per teacher
Students1,141enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,141
Grade Span9–12
Student:Teacher19.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch86%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
21.3:1
8.1%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
55
5.2%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,169
2.5%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:299
2.8%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:1,195
2.8%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,195
2.8%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:1,195
2.8%vs prior yrSSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.9:116.3:117.7:119.0:120.4:121.8:12020202120222023202420.6:120.1:119.9:119.7:121.3:1Livingston HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

1,1361,1511,1661,1811,1961,211555657585960202020212022202320241,1951,2061,1561,1411,1695860585855EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment1,1951,2061,1561,1411,169
Teacher FTE5860585855
Pupil : Teacher ratio20.6:120.1:119.9:119.7:121.3:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:2651:5311:7961:1,0621:1,3272015201720201:6151:3071:2991:1,2291:1,195Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:2651:5311:7961:1,0621:1,3272015201720201:1,2291:1,2291:1,1951:1,2291:1,2291:1,195Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)244
Nurses (FTE)111
Psychologists (FTE)111
Social Workers (FTE)011
Counselor : Pupils1:6151:3071:2991:250
Nurse : Pupils1:1,2291:1,2291:1,1951:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:1,2291:1,2291:1,1951:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:1,2291:1,1951:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.