CaliforniaSchoolsSan Joaquin County Community

San Joaquin County Community

PublicAlternative/other
Stockton, California · San Joaquin County Office of Education
Teachers56.0FTE
Ratio18.7:1students per teacher
Students1,046enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,046
Grade Span0–12
Student:Teacher18.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch85%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
17.0:1
9.1%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
60
7.1%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,021
2.4%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:111
45.3%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:1,391
75.7%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
NASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

15.1:115.9:116.7:117.4:118.2:119.0:12020202120222023202416.6:116.5:118.4:118.7:117.0:1This schoolUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

8979299619931,0251,057495254565861202020212022202320249329089201,0461,0215655505660EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment9329089201,0461,021
Teacher FTE5655505660
Pupil : Teacher ratio16.6:116.5:118.4:118.7:117.0:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:541:1081:1621:2161:2702015201720201:1721:2021:111Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:1,2361:2,4721:3,7081:4,9441:6,1802015201720201:1,6891:5,7221:1,391Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)65.18.4
Nurses (FTE)0.60.20.7
Psychologists (FTE)000
Social Workers (FTE)000
Counselor : Pupils1:1721:2021:1111:250
Nurse : Pupils1:1,6891:5,7221:1,3911:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.